Quick Links


Uncertainties - Extension of Smart Waterflooding from Core to Field ScaleNormal access

Authors: T. Kadeethum, H.K. Sarma, B.B. Maini and C. Jaruwattanasakul
Event name: IOR 2017 - 19th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery
Session: Poster Introductions 1
Publication date: 24 April 2017
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201700294
Organisations: EAGE
Language: English
Info: Extended abstract, PDF ( 1.01Mb )
Price: € 20

Smart waterflooding has emerged as an EOR process of much interest in recent years. Much research is being reported, along with a few successful field applications, notably clastics. In most cases, there are undeniable inconsistencies in results between lab and field cases. This leads to unpredictable outcomes and misleading profit prediction of smart waterflooding projects. The objective of this work is to evaluate uncertainties in smart waterflooding from core- to field-scale. Kozaki (2012) experiment is mimicked by 1-D numerical model that couples with geochemical reactions. Validation results show that there are many combinations of matching parameters that can describe coreflooding results. Each realization may lead to different results when extended to 3-D heterogeneity model. Hence, to cover ranges of uncertainties, many realizations should be tested before summarizing smart waterflooding performance. Full-field heterogeneity model also shows that smart waterflooding is sensitive to grid size and heterogeneity. With different grid volume settings, results vary dramatically. This may contribute towards smart waterflooding misinterpretation. Furthermore, heterogeneity alters smart waterflooding within a particular range by affecting cation exchange capacity, and subsequently interpolant value, which is used to represent system wettability. Therefore, these parameters should be accounted in field-scale simulation to obtain smart waterflooding true potential.

Back to the article list